6/18/20264:56:59PM Sent: From: EdwardCriado<ECriado@ci.benicia.ca.us To: "Mark","Jake","Wendy Stratton" Cc: Bcc: Importance: Normal Subject: Findings on the Mayors questions regarding alpr and NCRICWISN Attachmentsii image016978.png,image401107.png,image451772.png : image922429.png,image561300.png,image396803.png All, Ihaveinvestigatedtheconcernsreported abouttheFlockdatasharingbetweentheWesternStatesInformation Network (WSIN) and the Northern California Regional Intelligence Center (NCRIC). It's important to note that both organizations receive state funding and work with public safety government programs to support law enforcement against organized crime, drug trafficking and other harmful threats such as terrorism. They serve as a fusion center betweenlocal state andfederal agencies. In this instance, WISN had two analysts assigned to NCRIC as part of the fusion center, like a task force. These two analysts believed they were doing their jobs when they accessed and shared information with out of state and federal agencies. They were aware they could not share or search for any data related to reproductive investigations or immigration investigations, but they did not fully understand the restrictions on any out of state or federal sharing due toSB34.AlthoughBenicia cameras were included in some of thesesearches thatwere conductedfor out of state agencies or federal agencies (DEA), none of their inquiries or searches were related to immigration or reproductive rights. The searches they shared were for Homicide, Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), Drug trafficking (Fentanyl) and other serious criminal investigations. They provided clear reasons for each inquiry. We have clear expectations of the agencies we share our data with andNCRIC has a signed MOUwithBenicia.The upside to this story is that the auditing process works and discovered a training and personnel issue within NCRIC. NCRIC did not make an intentional decision to violate the MOU. They had two analysts assigned to their fusion center that had not been properly trained to completely understand SB34 and its restrictions. This knowledge gap resulted in a violation of policy and SB34. Transparency is not the absence or misuse or mistakes. Instead, transparency is the surfacing of misuse or mistakes sowe can better manage and use the system correctly.Mistakes place to identify these instances and address them when they appear. Flock has systematically improved upon the system to make it easier to identify instances of abuse or misuse. Without these systems in place, this audit likely would not have discovered this issue.SFPD certainly could have done a better job with their press release and explainingwhat actually happened. TedEdward Criad o 川 Deputy Police Chief PoliceDepartment 1941 POLICE O:707-746-4259 THE ECriado@ci.benicia.ca.us BENICIA CITY www.ci.benicia.ca.us/police
Public Records Exemptions Enclosed please find a copy of the response documents for your public process employed to review and produce the response documents. Reason Description Pages 1 of 1