Request:Audit of BeniciaPDFlock/ALPR accesslogs in light of SFPD findings

File: Request_ Audit of Benicia PD Flock_ALPR access logs in light of SFPD findings-Redacted (2).pdf Request: PR-2026-181 Sent: 2026-06-18 00:00:00 +0000 UTC Type: document Size: 189 KB OCR'd image-only scan

View the original PDF →

Sent: 6/18/202610:52:14AM From: To: "MarkMenesini”<MMenesini@ci.benicia.ca.us> Cc: <LLargaespada@ci.benicia.ca.us> Bcc: Importance:Normal Subject:Request:Audit of BeniciaPDFlock/ALPR accesslogs in light of SFPD findings Chief Mensini, senderandknowthecontentissafe. I'mwriting asaBenicia residentfollowing itsFlockALPRnetworkoverthepastyear,conductedonbehalfoffederalandout-of-stateagencies.ChiefLewdescribed it as"apparentlyastatewideissue," and the accessranthroughtheNorthernCaliforniaRegional IntelligenceCenter(NCRIC),withsearchestraced toWesternStatesInformationNetwork analysts. Giventhatpathway,I'dliketoask: 1.DoesBeniciaPDshareitsALPRdatawith,orgrantqueryaccessto,NCRICoranyotherfusioncenter? find? 3.What isthe current stateof the"national lookup"/nationwide and statewidesearchsettingsonoursystem?Are they still disabled?Areyou aware that there is anymechanismtogetaroundthem? 4.Will thedepartmentcommit toapublic-facing auditofaccesslogs,asseveral otherCaliforniacitieshavedone?Currentlythepubliclogsdonotofferthe informationnecessarytotracksuchinformation. Californialaw(SB34)prohibitssharingALPRdatawithout-of-stateagencies,soI'd appreciateclarityonhowthedepartmentverifiescomplianceratherthan relyingonFlock'svendor-sidesettings. Thankyouforyourtime.I'dwelcomeawrittenresponseand amhappytodiscussfurther. Bestreaards

Public Records Exemptions Enclosed please find a copy of the response documents for your public process employed to review and produce the response documents. Reason Description Pages 1 of 1