Request:Audit of BeniciaPDFlock/ALPR accesslogs in light of SFPD findings

File: Request_ Audit of Benicia PD Flock_ALPR access logs in light of SFPD findings-Redacted.pdf Request: PR-2026-181 Sent: 2026-06-18 00:00:00 +0000 UTC Type: document Size: 190 KB OCR'd image-only scan

View the original PDF →

Sent: 6/18/202610:52:14AM From: To: "MarkMenesini"<MMenesini@ci.benicia.ca.us> Cc: <TMacenski@ci.benicia.ca.us>"Steve Young"<SYoung@ci.benicia.ca.us>"Lionel Largaespada" <LLargaespada@ci.benicia.ca.us> Bcc: Importance:Normal Subject:Request:Audit of BeniciaPDFlock/ALPR accesslogs in light of SFPD findings ChiefMensini, senderandknowthecontentissafe. I'mwriting asaBenicia residentfollowing itsFlockALPRnetworkoverthepastyear,conductedonbehalfoffederalandout-of-stateagencies.ChiefLewdescribed it as"apparentlyastatewideissue," and the accessranthroughtheNorthernCaliforniaRegional IntelligenceCenter(NCRIC),withsearchestraced toWesternStatesInformationNetwork analysts. Giventhatpathway,I'dliketoask: 1.DoesBeniciaPDshareitsALPRdatawith,orgrantqueryaccessto,NCRICoranyotherfusioncenter? find? 3.What is the current stateof the"national lookup"/ nationwide and statewide search settingsonoursystem?Are they still disabled?Areyou aware that there is anymechanismtogetaroundthem? 4.Willthedepartment commit toapublic-facing audit of accesslogs,as several otherCalifornia citieshave done?Currently thepubliclogs donotofferthe informationnecessarytotracksuchinformation. Californialaw(SB34)prohibitssharingALPRdatawithout-of-stateagencies,soI'd appreciateclarityonhowthedepartmentverifiescomplianceratherthan relyingonFlock'svendor-sidesettings. Thankyouforyourtime.I'dwelcomeawrittenresponseand amhappytodiscussfurther. Bestregards,

Public Records Exemptions Enclosed please find a copy of the response documents for your public process employed to review and produce the response documents. Reason Description Pages 1 of 1